1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1971 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1971 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1971 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 244 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lotus Elan | 1971 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Elan | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1971 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2210 mm |
