1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 (160 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 weights approximately 804 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Lotus | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Elan | 280 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 82 L |