1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1978 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1978 Toyota Tercel is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,557 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Toyota Tercel weights approximately 124 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1978 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | Elan | Tercel |
Year Released | 1966 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1557 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2510 mm |