1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1980 Mini Clubman
To start off, 1980 Mini Clubman is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,557 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Lotus Elan weights approximately 42 kg more than 1980 Mini Clubman.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lotus Elan | 1980 Mini Clubman | |
| Make | Lotus | Mini |
| Model | Elan | Clubman |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1557 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2140 mm |
