1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lotus Elan | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Lotus | Volvo |
| Model | Elan | 66 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1287 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
