1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1981 Renault 20
To start off, 1981 Renault 20 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,645 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Renault 20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Renault 20 weights approximately 489 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1981 Renault 20 | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Elan | 20 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1557 cc | 1645 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2670 mm |