1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1982 Renault 11
To start off, 1982 Renault 11 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,721 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Renault 11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1982 Renault 11. (80 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Renault 11 weights approximately 199 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1982 Renault 11 | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Elan | 11 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 34 L |