1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1983 Mazda 323
To start off, 1983 Mazda 323 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,557 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda 323 weights approximately 154 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Lotus Elan (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 323. (79 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lotus Elan | 1983 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Elan | 323 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1557 cc | 1071 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2370 mm |
