1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1991 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 1991 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,431 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1991 Toyota Land Cruiser. (97 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1991 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Because 1991 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Toyota Land Cruiser (226 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Lotus Elan. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1991 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1991 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | Elan | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1966 | 1991 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1557 cc | 3431 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 105 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |