1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 1992 Renault 19 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Renault 19 weights approximately 399 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Elan | 19 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 161 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |