1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1994 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1994 Mercury Villager is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercury Villager weights approximately 1104 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1994 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Lotus | Mercury |
Model | Elan | Villager |
Year Released | 1966 | 1994 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2860 mm |