1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1994 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi Magna (114 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 675 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1994 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Elan | Magna |
Year Released | 1966 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1556 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2730 mm |