1966 Lotus Elan vs. 1997 Suzuki Sidekick
To start off, 1997 Suzuki Sidekick is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Suzuki Sidekick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki Sidekick, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 1997 Suzuki Sidekick | |
Make | Lotus | Suzuki |
Model | Elan | Sidekick |
Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 30 L |