1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2000 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra CL weights approximately 640 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lotus Elan | 2000 Mahindra CL | |
| Make | Lotus | Mahindra |
| Model | Elan | CL |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1556 cc | 2522 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2040 mm |
