1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Recon
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Recon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Recon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Recon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Recon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Recon has automatic transmission and 1966 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1966 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Recon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 2000 Oldsmobile Recon | |
Make | Lotus | Oldsmobile |
Model | Elan | Recon |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1556 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 68 L |