1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2000 Peugeot 106
To start off, 2000 Peugeot 106 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2000 Peugeot 106. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2000 Peugeot 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Peugeot 106 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 106, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 2000 Peugeot 106 | |
Make | Lotus | Peugeot |
Model | Elan | 106 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 40 L |