1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2002 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2002 Mahindra CL is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra CL weights approximately 604 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 2002 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Lotus Elan. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 2002 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Lotus | Mahindra |
Model | Elan | CL |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1557 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2040 mm |