1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica weights approximately 14 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lotus Elan | 2002 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Elan | Minica |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2350 mm |
