1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 339 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Elan | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2620 mm |