1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,557 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica weights approximately 14 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 2004 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Elan | Minica |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1557 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2350 mm |