1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2004 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2004 SsangYong Korando is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 SsangYong Korando (138 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 2004 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 2004 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Lotus | SsangYong |
Model | Elan | Korando |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1556 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |