1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,556 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 84 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Lotus | MCC |
Model | Elan | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1556 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 1810 mm |