1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2008 Tata Nano
To start off, 2008 Tata Nano is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Lotus Elan weights approximately 96 kg more than 2008 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 2008 Tata Nano | |
Make | Lotus | Tata |
Model | Elan | Nano |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 37 L |