1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2011 Citroen C-Zero
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Citroen C-Zero weights approximately 420 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lotus Elan | 2011 Citroen C-Zero | |
| Make | Lotus | Citroen |
| Model | Elan | C-Zero |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1475 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2550 mm |
