1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2011 Nissan Note
To start off, 2011 Nissan Note is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,557 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (115 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Note weights approximately 356 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 2011 Nissan Note | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | Elan | Note |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1557 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2600 mm |