1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2011 Peugeot 4007
To start off, 2011 Peugeot 4007 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Peugeot 4007 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot 4007 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 4007 should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 2011 Peugeot 4007 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 4007 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Peugeot 4007 (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Lotus Elan. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Peugeot 4007 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Lotus Elan | 2011 Peugeot 4007 | |
| Make | Lotus | Peugeot |
| Model | Elan | 4007 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1557 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
