1966 Lotus Elan vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (201 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Lotus Elan | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Lotus | Audi |
Model | Elan | A6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 201 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 75 L |