1966 Marcos 1500 vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 1966 Marcos 1500 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Marcos 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Marcos 1500 (85 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Marcos 1500 should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Saab 92 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1966 Marcos 1500.
Because 1966 Marcos 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Marcos 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Marcos 1500 | 1951 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Marcos | Saab |
| Model | 1500 | 92 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2480 mm |
