1966 Marcos 1500 vs. 2003 MG ZR
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Marcos 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Marcos 1500 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZR (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1966 Marcos 1500. (85 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 1966 Marcos 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZR weights approximately 410 kg more than 1966 Marcos 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Marcos 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Marcos 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZR (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Marcos 1500. (131 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Marcos 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Marcos 1500 | 2003 MG ZR | |
Make | Marcos | MG |
Model | 1500 | ZR |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2510 mm |