1966 Marcos 1500 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Marcos 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Marcos 1500 would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1966 Marcos 1500. (85 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1966 Marcos 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 800 kg more than 1966 Marcos 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (213 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Marcos 1500. (131 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Marcos 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Marcos 1500 | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Marcos | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 1500 | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 131 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2760 mm |
