1966 Marcos 1800 vs. 1950 Saab 92
To start off, 1966 Marcos 1800 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Marcos 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Marcos 1800 (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Marcos 1800 should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Saab 92 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1966 Marcos 1800.
Because 1966 Marcos 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Marcos 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Marcos 1800 | 1950 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Marcos | Saab |
| Model | 1800 | 92 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1950 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1783 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2480 mm |
