1966 Marcos 1800 vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Marcos 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Marcos 1800 would be higher.
Because 1966 Marcos 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Marcos 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Marcos 1800 | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Marcos | Nissan |
| Model | 1800 | Leaf |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2700 mm |
