1966 Maserati Mistral vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Maserati Mistral (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 323 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Maserati Mistral (363 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1966 Maserati Mistral will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Maserati Mistral | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | Mistral | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1966 | 1972 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 363 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2210 mm |