1966 Maserati Mistral vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Maserati Mistral (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 495 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Maserati Mistral (363 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Maserati Mistral will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Maserati Mistral | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Maserati | Zastava |
| Model | Mistral | 102 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 363 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2160 mm |
