1966 Maserati Mistral vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Maserati Mistral (252 HP) has 185 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1966 Maserati Mistral is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Maserati Mistral. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Maserati Mistral | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Maserati | Ford |
Model | Mistral | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2490 mm |