1966 Maserati Mistral vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Maserati Mistral (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ranger. (207 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Maserati Mistral (363 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ranger. (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Maserati Mistral will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Maserati Mistral | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Maserati | Ford |
Model | Mistral | Ranger |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 363 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3193 mm |