1966 Mazda Familia vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Clio (171 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1966 Mazda Familia. (35 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1966 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Clio weights approximately 315 kg more than 1966 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mazda Familia. (60 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mazda Familia | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Familia | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 782 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2480 mm |