1966 Mazda Familia vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (189 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1966 Mazda Familia. (35 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1966 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 379 kg more than 1966 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mazda Familia. (60 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mazda Familia | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Familia | Celica |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 782 cc | 1796 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1119 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |
