1966 Mazda Familia vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1966 Mazda Familia. (57 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 925 kg more than 1966 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mazda Familia. (81 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mazda Familia | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | Familia | Camaro |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 984 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 72 L |