1966 Mazda Familia vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1966 Mazda Familia. (35 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1966 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 973 kg more than 1966 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mazda Familia. (60 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mazda Familia | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | Familia | Equinox |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 782 cc | 2400 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 71 L |