1966 Mercury Comet vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 1966 Mercury Comet is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (118 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Comet | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Mercury | Saab |
Model | Comet | 92 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3279 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2480 mm |