1966 Mercury Comet vs. 1971 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1971 ZAZ 966 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (198 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1971 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1971 ZAZ 966.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (382 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mercury Comet | 1971 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Mercury | ZAZ |
| Model | Comet | 966 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4738 cc | 885 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 198 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2170 mm |
