1966 Mercury Comet vs. 1977 Mini MK IV
To start off, 1977 Mini MK IV is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (118 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1977 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1977 Mini MK IV.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (258 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Comet | 1977 Mini MK IV | |
Make | Mercury | Mini |
Model | Comet | MK IV |
Year Released | 1966 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3279 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2040 mm |