1966 Mercury Comet vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (268 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Comet | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Comet | Ranger |
Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6393 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4690 mm |