1966 Mercury Comet vs. 1986 Renault 18
To start off, 1986 Renault 18 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (405 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1986 Renault 18. (104 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 18.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (645 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 18. (163 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Comet | 1986 Renault 18 | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Comet | 18 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6393 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 405 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 645 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |