1966 Mercury Comet vs. 1993 Renault Safrane
To start off, 1993 Renault Safrane is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (198 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1993 Renault Safrane. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Safrane.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Renault Safrane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (382 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Safrane. (175 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Safrane.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Comet | 1993 Renault Safrane | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Comet | Safrane |
Year Released | 1966 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4738 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2680 mm |