1966 Mercury Comet vs. 1999 Renault Avantime
To start off, 1999 Renault Avantime is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (118 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1999 Renault Avantime. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Avantime.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Avantime, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (258 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Avantime. (255 Nm). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Avantime.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mercury Comet | 1999 Renault Avantime | |
| Make | Mercury | Renault |
| Model | Comet | Avantime |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3279 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2630 mm |
