1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2002 Honda Passport
To start off, 2002 Honda Passport is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (267 HP) has 77 more horse power than 2002 Honda Passport. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Passport.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Passport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (546 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Passport. (256 Nm). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Passport.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mercury Comet | 2002 Honda Passport | |
| Make | Mercury | Honda |
| Model | Comet | Passport |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6393 cc | 3201 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 546 Nm | 256 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2710 mm |
