1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2003 Spyker C8
To start off, 2003 Spyker C8 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Comet weights approximately 560 kg more than 2003 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Comet | 2003 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Mercury | Spyker |
Model | Comet | C8 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6393 cc | 4170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2580 mm |