1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (267 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (240 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 525 kg more than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (546 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (427 Nm). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Sequoia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mercury Comet | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Mercury | Toyota |
| Model | Comet | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6393 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 546 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 103 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 2300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3010 mm |
